[lug] DNS question, was List status?

[Chris M]

Just because they get the DNS info from your authoritative server does not
mean they aren't caching old info before a recent change.....

Chris

> From: Chip Atkinson <chip at rmpg.org>
> Reply-To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:08:22 -0600 (MDT)
> To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
> Subject: [lug] DNS question, was List status?
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> I was looking at a DNS problem which may be causing my mail to be messed
> up.  
> 
> I used nslookup on the two nameservers that are in my resolv.conf and got
> two different answers.  One looks like it's got a bad entry, and the other
> looks ok.  Here's what I get:
> 
> 
>> server 204.147.80.5
> Default Server:  ns1.uswest.net
> Address:  204.147.80.5
> 
>> rmpg.org
> Server:  ns1.uswest.net
> Address:  204.147.80.5
> 
> Name:    rmpg.org.pupman.com
> 
>> server 206.196.128.1
> Default Server:  ns2.dnvr.uswest.net
> Address:  206.196.128.1
> 
>> rmpg.org
> Server:  ns2.dnvr.uswest.net
> Address:  206.196.128.1
> 
> Non-authoritative answer:
> Name:    rmpg.org
> Address:  63.225.119.186
> 
> The thing is that I thought that they were getting the information from
> rmpg.org (me), which should mean that the information that they have would
> either be both screwed up or both ok.
> 
> Chip
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug