[Re:[lug] Memory problem]

Scott A. Herod herod at interact-tv.com
Wed Nov 29 10:33:03 MST 2000


Ick.  Just reread this.  The missing "not" changes the whole meaning.
It should have read, "It did NOT correctly report usage when memory
was released by a process."

Scott

> 
> "Scott A. Herod" <herod at interact-tv.com> wrote:
> > I don't know about the "top" command available on linux boxes, but the
> > one on IRIX had exactly the same problem as mentioned in a previous
> > note.
> > It did correctly report usage when memory was released by a process.
> > I wouldn't trust it.
> >
> > Scott
> >




More information about the LUG mailing list