[lug] Re: LUG digest, Vol 1 #642 - 13 msgs

[C Menzes]

Just chiming in as I am new to the list. I believe that subject lines are
very important, and I believe that having [lug] as the leading term is
very beneficial for sorting through procmail.
Sorry if this email is just a vote from the new guy, but its a topic I am
very motivated about.

-cjm


On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, John Starkey wrote:

> >  >> My apologies to the list, I meant to send the reply privately. << 
> > Thanks for thinking of us. :o) Your .sigs obviously invite further 
> > discussion on the list though - yes? I know free speech is good n'all, 
> > but it just seems like you're trying to stir things up. Is this the 
> > place for it? -- Gary -- An equal and opposite political comment could 
> > go here.
> 
> 
> I personally enjoy his quotes, especially the previous, non-political,
> ones. As he stated the debate was an accident.
> 
> Moving on. How do you feel about the relevency of subject lines in
> emails?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
>