[lug] looking for TeX viewer/print

J. Wayde Allen wallen at lug.boulder.co.us
Fri Aug 24 17:09:01 MDT 2001


On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 rotering at animalcules.com wrote:

> One drawback of this production cycle is that ghostscript font
> rendering leaves something to be desired.  This means that the PDF
> file produced looks a bit shabby under Windows, but it prints
> perfectly well.

I was dealing with this a while back.  The thread on this can be found in
the archives starting at

   http://archive.lug.boulder.co.us/bymonth/2001.05/msg00320.html

I summarized my solution at

   http://archive.lug.boulder.co.us/bymonth/2001.05/msg00334.html

- Wayde
  (wallen at lug.boulder.co.us)




More information about the LUG mailing list