[lug] SSSCA to make all open source software illegal

Shannon Johnston nunar at nunar.com
Wed Oct 24 14:08:27 MDT 2001


What about faxing? Kind of the personal touch without the Anthrax.

Shannon Johnston
nunar at nunar.com
--------------------------------

Hiroshima '45 Chernobyl '86 Windows '95

--------------------------------

On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, J. Wayde Allen wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Ken Weinert wrote:
> 
> > 	While I agree that this is a good idea, given the current
> > situation in Washington how many of them will actually get read? And
> > in what time frame?
> > 
> > 	I heard on NPR yesterday that they might just burn all the
> > mail they have already had delivered because it would take too much
> > time to go through each one and verify that it is clean. 
> > 
> > 	That obviously doesn't affect mail that hasn't been sent yet
> > :) but in this climate would it be a good idea to use both e- and s-
> > mail to ensure timely delivery?
> 
> Yeah, I was thinking the same thing while typing the original missive.  
> Normally I'd suggest regular (snail mail) rather than e-mail.  After all,
> I tend to think that a hand written letter on real paper tends to add some
> legitimacy to a persons correspondence.  In this case though ...?
> 
> As you suggest, both would probably be a good idea.
> 
> - Wayde
>   (wallen at lug.boulder.co.us)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> 




More information about the LUG mailing list