[lug] Kernel compile issues was: Re lpc status and sh

[John Karns]

On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, D. Stimits said:

> I would guess that the original poster had changed which modules were to
> be compiled and failed to do a full make modules_install. If that
> happened, even modules that *had* been allowed in the kernel might have
> changed in such a way that they were rejected. Does anyone here know if
> modules 100% relocatable, or if they have to match some offset in the
> symbol tables? My suspicion is that they do (I always compile in
> versioning though, which might change the answer).

Maybe that's the grand difference then.  I always say no to

Set version information on all module symbols

----------------------------------------------------------------
John Karns                                        jkarns at csd.net