[lug] mount NTFS
Tony Dyson
the_anorak at worldnet.att.net
Sun Sep 1 10:29:06 MDT 2002
Good adavice. Stick to SMB mounts. When you installed VMWare, did it
offer you an option to enable access to the local file system? VMWare
for Linux does; I haven't used the Windows version.
There's a handy tool at http://www.bnro.de/~schmidjo/ for quickly
finding out what SMB shares you can "see" on your network.
Mr Viggy wrote:
> Read only is good, because AFAIK, NTFS write is still experimental.
>
> Now, as far as VMWare goes, depending on how you setup your VMWare
> "disk" you can't directly mount your hard drive. For example, if you
> setup a "virtual disk" on your NTFS drive, you need to treat your RH
> VMWare installation as a seperate machine on your network. So, in order
> to mount your NTFS file system, you actually need to use Samba, or the
> 'smbfs' filesystem. Which is actually better! Why? Because, like I
> said, NTFS write is still experimental and can screw up your disk!
>
> OTOH, if you install RH on the same hard drive as your Windows OS, but
> you boot directly into it, you would need to use the NTFS file system to
> mount it; because the file system is on the same harddrive as the OS.
>
> Think of VMWare's virtual disk as if it were a completely different
> system on a network connected to your host system.
>
> So, to make a long story short, check out Samba, and the smbfs file system.
>
> Viggy
>
>
> luke p wrote:
>
>> How do I mount an NTFS partition in RH 7.3? Is there something unique
>> I need to set up before I can just use the mount command? Also, can it
>> be mounted when its active, i.e. I'm in Windows (XP) already, using
>> VMware to boot Linux (on a dual boot machine) so from within Linux
>> under Vmware mount the NTFS partition? (At most I only need to have
>> read ability).
>>
>> Thanks
>> Luke
More information about the LUG
mailing list