[lug] top posting WAS Re: NO Attachments!!!

[Sexton, George]

Personally, I think requiring bottom posting is one of the silliest things I
have seen. You mean I have to wade through the message to find what the
person said. Ridiculous.

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-admin at lug.boulder.co.us [mailto:lug-admin at lug.boulder.co.us]On
Behalf Of John Hernandez
Sent: 24 October, 2002 1:51 PM
To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
Subject: [lug] top posting WAS Re: NO Attachments!!!


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

dan radom wrote:

|
| html mail, top posting and so on.  nothing's more bothersome then top
| posting IMHO.

I'm glad you mentioned top posting, because I've never encountered this
bit of netiquette before.  I've always been uncertain about how to best
set my reply defaults.  Now that I've read the HOWTO, it makes perfect
sense.

- --

~  - John Hernandez - Network Engineer - 303-497-6392 -
~ |  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration   |
~ |  Mailstop R/OM62. 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305  |
~  ----------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9uE8OB1Kl6VhqfiMRAkTLAJ9Yyi9FB1R4J0aZDEJh+lEwgBDeYACfaEe9
Qnq/+YBXjiSx546thsiYAFs=
=+xFQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug