[lug] LGPL question

[Michael J. Hammel]

On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 07:15, Jeffrey Siegal wrote:
> The intent here is that the user is able to modify and recompile the 
> LGPLed library and then relink that with your program.  That doesn't 
> necessarily require that any of the source code for your program be 
> distributed -- usually object files or an object library is enough.

So I would have to distribute:
1. The static library code
2. The program object not linked with the library
3. The statically linked program

That way the program could be relinked with a recompiled library.  Does
that sound about right?
-- 
Michael J. Hammel           |
The Graphics Muse           |   Chinese Proverb:
mjhammel at graphics-muse.org  |        Man who run in front of car get tired
http://www.graphics-muse.com