[lug] Question on allowable posts to BLUG

[Dhruva Reddy]

Yeah, I agree that it is inappropriate to allow this sort of thing of 
M$.

And I wholeheartedly agree that the original poster should decline it 
politely--being mean or rude would generate more negative press that we 
really don't need.

-d

On Dec 19, 2003, at 12:16 PM, Kenneth D. Weinert wrote:

> I would politely state that this type of request is not for this list.
>
> I do have a question, however: what is the status of emails on the
> list? I just wonder if the responses here could be used in some sort
> of campaign of Microsoft's to cast Linux users in a bad light? Are
> postings to this list freely usable elsewhere?
>
> Have we just been trolled and reeled in?
>
> -- 
>    .--.     Ken Weinert   mc at quarter-flash.com
>   |o_o |
>   ||_/ |    303-452-6603  (on the national no-call list :)
>  //   \ \
> (|     | )  GnuPG: 9274F1CE  GnuPG available at http://www.gnupg.org/
> /'\_   _/`\
> \___)=(___/ 1D87 3720 BB77 4489 A928  79D6 F8EC DD76 9274 F1CE
> Computer programming is an art, because it requires skill and 
> ingenuity,
> and especially because it produces objects of beauty - Don Knuth
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug