[lug] AT&T Trips Up SCO

[Glenn Ashton]

I don't think that was the point.  Lots of people are interested in this
topic, it's just that your post would be more useful, or "value-added" if
you briefly mentioned why you thought the article was important or what
the main point of the article was.  Titles can be misleading, and some
people may not know that you usually provide links to interesting things
as opposed to trolling...

Also, for those of us who use text based email on remote boxes, having a
summary prevents the hassle of copying a link into our browser to see what
something is about.  Yes, I am lazy.

My 2 cents.

-Glenn

On 18 Feb 2004, Crawford Rainwater wrote:

> I personally think the title of the article from ComputerWorld, in
> addition to the current events of SCO vs. IBM for the past year+ is
> enough.  If people are not long concerned with these events and how they
> may or may not effect the Linux Community, let me know and I will stop
> posting such related articles to the Boulder LUG, or perhaps the Boulder
> LUG should follow suit as the NCLUG with an NCLUG-Discuss or a CLUE-Talk
> style list.
>
> Just my $0.02.
>
> --- Crawford
>
> On 2004-02-18 09:39 Evelyn Mitchell <efm at tummy.com> wrote:
> >
> > Could you write a couple of sentences why this is interesting when you
> > mail it to the list?
> >
> > * On 2004-02-18 09:30 Crawford Rainwater
> > <crawford.rainwater at linux-etc.net> wrote:
> >> >From ComputerWorld:
> >>
> >>
> http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/unix/story/0,10801,90205,00.html?f=x2046
> >>
> >> --- Crawford
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug
>