[lug] On standards conformance

[Sean Reifschneider]

On 11/30/2009 08:29 PM, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> I didn't say to do that, or even that everyone should.  You were the 
> one with the problem, so I kindly pointed out that your mailer was
> behind the times in certain regards, and offered one possible upgrade

"the times" do *NOT* include using PDF as the primary content for e-mail.
My mail readers are *NOT* behind "the times".

Your entire discussion is based on the idea that PDF as the primary body
for e-mail is perfectly normal, and you are making language-lawyer
arguments based on this, bogus, assertion.

As nobody else seems to be interested in taking up my assertion that we
should be blocking PDF attachments, I'll guess that everyone else is happy
with this and call this discussion ended.

Sean
-- 
Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff <jafo at tummy.com>
tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/pipermail/lug/attachments/20091201/30823a8f/attachment.pgp>