[lug] good place to park or sell domains?

Robert Racansky robert.racansky at gmail.com
Wed Jan 2 10:22:48 MST 2013


On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Robert Racansky
<robert.racansky at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Robert Racansky
> <robert.racansky at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Robert Racansky
>> <robert.racansky at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Robert Racansky
>>> <robert.racansky at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Steve Sullivan <sullivan at mathcom.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have about 15 unused domains which I've picked up over the
>>>>> years.  Where would be an *inexpensive* place to park them?
>>>>> Where is a good place to sell them?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This morning, I received 5 hours notice to appear in Boulder courtroom
>>>> H to contest a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order against me for
>>>> using the name of a lawyer as as a domain name.
>>>>
>>>> See http://www.jonahhunt.com
>>>>
>>>> Or, if the judge orders me to take it down today, it is preserved at
>>>>
>>>> http://www.freezepage.com/1326124691PIRPUAOMTG
>>>>
>>>> The page has links to court cases regarding the Anti-cybersquatting
>>>> Consumer Protection Act.
>>>>
>>>> More later, but I've got to be in court in a little over an hour.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Jonah G. Hunt <jonahhunt at yahoo.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:41 AM
>>>> Subject: Boulder County District Court Case No. 12CV110
>>>> To: Robert Racansky <robert.racansky at gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Racansky:  the attached lawsuit was filed yesterday.  A hearing on
>>>> the motion for temporary restraining order has been scheduled for
>>>> today at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom H in Boulder District Court.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jonah Hunt
>>>
>>>
>>> re  www.jonahhunt.com
>>>
>>> A few minutes ago, I received noticed that
>>>
>>>  - a complaint has been filed with the National Arbitration Forum
>>>
>>> - and that I was charged a $50 dispute fee
>>>
>>
>>
>> The Complaint has been dismissed "without prejudice" due to procedural
>> deficiencies in the original Complaint.
>>
>
>
>
> Immediately after the "Complaint" was dismissed, Jonah Hunt and his
> attorney Steven Rinehart filed the same Complaint with the NAF.
>
> The new case number is National Arbitration Forum case FA1211001471550
>
> All documents I have are posted at  http://www.jonahhunt.com/home/2012cv110




I just received the NAF's decision

"Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <jonahhunt.com> domain name be
TRANSFERRED from the Respondent to Complainant.

Calvin A. Hamilton as Panelist
Dated:  December 31, 2012"



More information about the LUG mailing list