[lug] ISDN modems

[Stephen G. Smith]

I am demoing (sp?) the Superpipe line from Lucent.
They have much more RAM and handle the NAT stuff alot better than
the old pipeline series. We have used them for both ISDN and
frac T1 service and they have been running flawless.

Cheers,

SGS

>From: Sean Reifschneider <jafo at tummy.com>
>Reply-To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
>To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
>Subject: Re: [lug] ISDN modems
>Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 12:18:06 -0600
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [216.17.150.53] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id 
>MHotMailBB5AEB9B00BFD820F3CDD81196350C640; Wed Aug 09 11:19:07 2000
>Received: (qmail 13832 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2000 18:18:24 -0000
>Received: from localhost (HELO dev.tummy.com) (alias at 127.0.0.1)  by 
>localhost with SMTP; 9 Aug 2000 18:18:24 -0000
>Received: (qmail 13613 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2000 18:18:10 -0000
>Received: from www.tummy.com (HELO tummy.com) (qmailr at 216.17.150.34)  by 
>lists.lug.boulder.co.us with SMTP; 9 Aug 2000 18:18:10 -0000
>Received: (qmail 28882 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2000 18:18:09 -0000
>Received: (qmail 28879 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2000 18:18:08 -0000
>Received: from cantsleep.linsomniac.com (HELO tummy.com) (@216.17.150.2)  
>by www.tummy.com with SMTP; 9 Aug 2000 18:18:08 -0000
>Received: (qmail 15687 invoked by uid 10); 9 Aug 2000 18:18:08 -0000
>Received: (qmail 14461 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2000 18:18:07 -0000
>From lug-admin at lug.boulder.co.us Wed Aug 09 11:20:26 2000
>Return-Path: <blugdom-lug-owner at lug.boulder.co.us>
>Delivered-To: blugdom-lug at lists.lug.boulder.co.us
>Delivered-To: blugdom-lug at lug.boulder.co.us
>Message-ID: <20000809121806.B1061 at tummy.com>
>References: <3991955C.61E39F84 at archenergy.com>
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
>In-Reply-To: <3991955C.61E39F84 at archenergy.com>; from 
>fschmid at archenergy.com on Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 11:31:08AM -0600
>Sender: lug-admin at lug.boulder.co.us
>Errors-To: lug-admin at lug.boulder.co.us
>X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
>Precedence: bulk
>List-Id: Boulder (Colorado) Linux Users Group -- General Mailing List 
><lug.lug.boulder.co.us>
>X-BeenThere: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
>
>On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 11:31:08AM -0600, Ferdinand Schmid wrote:
> >Do any of you have recommendations for ISDN routers (with built-in
> >firewall) that I could set up and then expect to serve some completely
> >computer illiterate folks for some time?
>
>Microcom makes one that's pretty expensive ($800).  Netgear's is pretty
>cheap ($400), but it has some problems with masquerading, and the software
>upgrade that was promised well over a year ago never seemed to materialize.
>The Cisco 1600s are also reasonably expensive but they do have full NAT
>and firewalling.  Netopia had one that works, but it was fairly hard
>to configure to to auto-redial.  I've found the Ascend Pipeline's to be
>somewhat hard to manage in the past, but I think they've gotten better.
>
>Were I to choose today, I'd probably go with the Netgear, but the Cisco
>or Microcom may be better for you.  The Microcom had some pretty friendly
>Windows software for configuring it, and does NAT pretty well
>
>Sean
>--
>  I have a large collection of sea shells, which I keep scattered on 
>beaches
>  around the world.  Maybe you've seen it...  -- Steven Wright
>Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <jafo at tummy.com>
>tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python
>
>_______________________________________________
>Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
>Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com