[lug] dump, cp
Michael J. Hammel
mjhammel at graphics-muse.org
Tue Sep 5 23:48:31 MDT 2000
Thus spoke D. Stimits
> However, this apparently does a raw output format, and is no longer
> mountable as ext2. One thing I don't care for is that I can't simply
> mount it and browse files.
Correct. dump is a raw data format. Would you really want an exact ext2
copy on the second disk that was mountable? After all, that would mean *2*
root partitions! Imagine if any old user could accomplish that!
> Does anyone know a way to make cp ignore /proc/ when using cp? Or maybe
> there is simply some good software that would make all of this trivial?
We just covered this, actually. See discussions on tar, cpio and the ilk.
Tar will accept a file listing the files to copy (-T, I think) or listing
the files to exclude (-X). Strung together in a series of commands reading
from stdin you can accomplish exactly what you're looking for here on a
local (or even NFS mounted) system.
There are lots of other ways too. I'm sure we're about to hear them all. ;-)
> Until I get a real tape drive, what would be the best means of backup
> software?
rsync -rv between two machines. The former is the production box, the
latter is the backup box, and it can be automated in all sorts of manner.
I suggest this only because I think it's a clever solution that's a cheap
way to make use of an old 386/486 *IF* it will handle a big enough hard
drive. If it doesn't, you might be able to put in a bunch of smaller
drives and use rsync to backup partitions to different disks.
Anyway, there are lots of little options like this. I'm sure a simple disk
mirroring package exists too since making exact duplicates of hard disks in a
production environment is a common tasks for many IS departments. I just
don't happen to know of any such packages.
--
Michael J. Hammel |
The Graphics Muse | Why is the man who invests all your money called
mjhammel at graphics-muse.org | a broker?
http://www.graphics-muse.com
More information about the LUG
mailing list