[lug] A bit confused
Carl.Wagner at Level3.com
Carl.Wagner at Level3.com
Tue Oct 3 19:22:36 MDT 2000
SCSI would have been a "better choice". If the major system manufactures
selected it instead of IDE then it would be built into every motherboard by
now just like IDE is today. This would have increased the cost of motherboards
by about $5.00 instead of $100-$300 for a good controller. And there would not
be the 20%-200% premium on drive prices.
Manufacturers consider SCSI only for "high end" system and therefore can
increase there profit margins on it.
Carl.
Nate Duehr wrote:
>
> Uh, you mean SCSI *is* better, not *would have been* better, right? :)
>
> I love using SCSI CD-RW burners under Linux/BSD/whatever... much better
> than their IDE counterparts.
>
> Nate
>
> Carl.Wagner at Level3.com wrote:
> >
> > I assume that Howard is talking about the proprietary interface Panasonic
> > cdrom. I have one of those with the ISA jumper configured SB16 card.
> >
> > You may have a cdrom interface on the SB16PCI but it is most likely a IDE
> > interface, not the proprietary Panasonic one. As far as I know, it is the
> > proprietary interface that uses the sbpcd driver.
> >
> > I am sure glad that they standardized on the IDE interface instead of all the
> > proprietary ones. (SCSI would have been better though.)
> >
> > Carl.
> >
> > "D. Stimits" wrote:
> > >
> > > Rob Riggs wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Also, contrary to what others have suggested, I don't
> > > > think you will find any sbpcd card built that use PNP.
> > > > Everyone I have seen used jumpers. (Think *really* cheap.)
> > >
> > > PCI is of course all PNP. I have one I can bring to the meeting, at
> > > least the box with specs. It is listed as SB-2770, soundblast 16 by
> > > creative labs. They were sold by Electronics Boutique. On the creative
> > > labs web site it is listed as sound blaster 16 pci (the PCI and software
> > > configured soundblaster):
> > > http://www.soundblaster.com/products/sb16pci/
> > >
> > > In terms of irq, this is about the kernel config if it isn't a module,
> > > not the other line that was mentioned. I've always preferred the
> > > non-module for sb. In the case of module support, I would assume one
> > > must still specify irq?
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I am fairly certain that SoundBlaster never made a PNP
> > > > audio card with an sbpcd interface. By that time they'd
> > > > switched to the vastly superior IDE interface.
> > > >
> > > > And I'd fall out of my chair if anyone could show me a
> > > > PCI card that contained an sbpcd interface.
> > > >
> > > > The sbpcd interface is polled. There are never any
> > > > interrupt vectors used by these controllers. (Combo
> > > > cards like the SoundBlaster had IRQ settings, but
> > > > these were used only by the sound hardware.)
> > > >
> > > > Howard Smith wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I am attempting to put Suse linux on my old 486 (AST with an overdrive
> > > > > chip). The CD-ROM, an old one, a Matsushita/Panasonicis giving me
> > > > > problems.
> > > > >
> > > > > When I install the module from the floppy, it asks for a specific set of
> > > > > parameters. "sbpcd=0x230,1" is the example given.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now the question, what are these specifically ? I tried the IO port
> > > > > and IRQ # in combinations to no luck. where can I find out what they
> > > > > are, just point me in the right direction and I can figure it out...
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks, howie smith
> > > > >
> > > > > Give a man a fish, and you feed him once. Teach a man to fish and pretty
> > > > > soon he'll start lying
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> > > > > Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Rob Riggs
> > > > http://www.pangalactic.org/
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> > > > Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> > > Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> > Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
More information about the LUG
mailing list