[lug] Redhat 7.0

[Nate Duehr]

LOL!  I like Sean's way of seeing it.

> From: Sean Reifschneider <jafo at tummy.com>
> Reply-To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 23:07:49 -0600
> To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
> Subject: Re: [lug] Redhat 7.0
> 
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 10:35:18PM -0600, John Hernandez wrote:
>> Maybe they should just ditch the meaningless release numbers and go with
>> something less subjective like "Redhat October 2000."  Or maybe someone
>> else has an explanation that makes sense, and I'm just talkin' smack.
> 
> It's a "keeping up with the Joneses" thing.  Other places bumped up to the
> next major, so...  I can see the 1.2 to 2.0 thing in the kernel, but all
> these distros that are at major release 7 are just silly.
> 
> Besides, KRUD has them beat as far as big numbers.  This month's release
> is over 20 million: 20001002  ;-)
> 
> Sean
> -- 
> Actual error message:  "Keyboard not connected.  Press F1 to continue."
> Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <jafo at tummy.com>
> tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
>