[lug] follow up

[D. Stimits]

Ken Kinder wrote:
> 
> Ah - I got a reply (Thanks, Ted!) informing me that -lfoo looks for
> libfoo, so it's not literal. The only problem now is that it's
> complaining about missing symbals even when the simbals are in
> libpython1.5.a -- any suggestions?
> 
> --
> Ken Kinder
> www.kenkinder.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug

Is it at runtime it complains? If so, your libpython1.5.a likely isn't
in the linker path. Try adding the lib or a sym link to it in your ld
search path (see /etc/ld.so.conf), then run ldconfig to update the
contents.