[lug] Internet Access

[Stephen G. Smith]

What about a second line and dual analog/MULTILINK PPP
I ran that under a few linux installs with success...


>From: llornkcor <ljp at llornkcor.com>
>Reply-To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
>To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
>Subject: Re: [lug] Internet Access
>Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 19:37:03 -0700
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [216.17.150.53] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id 
>MHotMailBC38DC7500C5400431E4D81196350B870; Wed Jan 24 18:37:42 2001
>Received: (qmail 17249 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2001 02:37:17 -0000
>Received: from localhost (HELO dev.tummy.com) (alias at 127.0.0.1)  by 
>localhost with SMTP; 25 Jan 2001 02:37:17 -0000
>Received: (qmail 17131 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2001 02:37:08 -0000
>Received: from www.tummy.com (HELO tummy.com) (qmailr at 216.17.150.34)  by 
>lists.lug.boulder.co.us with SMTP; 25 Jan 2001 02:37:08 -0000
>Received: (qmail 12556 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2001 02:37:07 -0000
>Received: (qmail 12553 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2001 02:37:07 -0000
>Received: from charon.host4u.net (@209.150.128.172)  by www.tummy.com with 
>SMTP; 25 Jan 2001 02:37:07 -0000
>Received: from spiritship ([206.168.3.213])by charon.host4u.net 
>(8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA19004for <lug at lug.boulder.co.us>; Wed, 24 Jan 
>2001 20:36:40 -0600
>From lug-admin at lug.boulder.co.us Wed Jan 24 18:39:14 2001
>Return-Path: <blugdom-lug-owner at lug.boulder.co.us>
>Delivered-To: blugdom-lug at lists.lug.boulder.co.us
>Delivered-To: blugdom-lug at lug.boulder.co.us
>Message-Id: <SAK.2001.01.24.qqeaatst at spiritship>
>X-Priority: 3
>X-Mailer: Mail Warrior
>X-Mailer-Version: v3.57
>Sender: lug-admin at lug.boulder.co.us
>Errors-To: lug-admin at lug.boulder.co.us
>X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
>Precedence: bulk
>List-Id: Boulder (Colorado) Linux Users Group -- General Mailing List 
><lug.lug.boulder.co.us>
>X-BeenThere: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
>
> > Could be worse than that, you could live in the Siberian district of
> > Longmont. My part of town has filtered lines, so no dsl. It is too far
> > from Boulder without expensive boosters for ISDN. Cable doesn't do
>I've had dsl in Longmont (old section) for about 2 or 3 months. I've had 
>problems with regular
>modem service about a year or so ago. Something about an old switch or 
>something...
>
>cbos>show uptime
>Current uptime is 39 days, 3 hours and 5 minutes
>
>I can't complain. Have had only one outtage that I know of. Not only do I 
>get to live in a cool old
>house with added-on electrical circuits, barely even plumbing in it, but I 
>get broadband access.
>Get it if you can, cause all the bytes are running out....fast...
>:)
>ljp
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
>Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com