[lug] Line quality?
Matt Clauson
mec at dotorg.org
Sun Feb 4 11:43:44 MST 2001
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 10:09:45AM -0700, Timothy C. Klein wrote:
> Tony,
>
> I think the telco is only, stritcly speaking, obligated to give you 1 POTS
> capable line. That being said, it usually seems to me hit and miss about
> these. If you get a friendly repair screener at Qwest (that's who it is,
> right?) they will send out a net tech to try and figure it out. If the
> the screener is grumpy or a up-tight, they will tell you your modem
> connection speed is none of their problem if the voice is working.
>
> If you want to be really certain that someone comes out, you could say you hear
> noise on the line, and that it causes problems. Even if you don't, hear, it is
> likely something is wrong with your line (grounded, unbalanced, crossed, or
> something like that). 2400 is REALLY slow. Now you do mean 2400 bps? If you
> mean 24000 bps, then I wouldn't be too optimistic about getting it fixed. Those
> kinds of speeds often seem to be the result of Pair Gain (subcriber loop
> carrier, your POTS leaves the CO as digital, gets converted to analog at your
> cross box. Said D to A conversion is less then perfect for digital data on your
> modem). Or a UDC, which is similar, but only for your house. In these cases a
> nice net tech may try to give you a copper pair, but in Pair Gain cross boxes
> they are often not available, or if they are they may be worse.
I need to backtrack this, because I dunno if it's legit... However, I
could swear that a few years back, I read something that said that
telcos are required by FCC regs to provide a line that is at least DS0
(56k) capable... And that's usually useful in helping turn up t1's
and stuff on dirty lines, since some specs are similar.
I'll see if I can find it again.
--mec
More information about the LUG
mailing list