[lug] LaTeX and distilling to PDF
J. Wayde Allen
wallen at lug.boulder.co.us
Fri May 18 10:57:10 MDT 2001
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Ronald Kumon wrote:
> When you look at your PDF document in Acrobat Reader and do "File:Document
> Info:Fonts", do you see listings like:
>
> Original Font Type Encoding Used Font Type
> CMR10 Type 1 Custom Embedded Subset Type 1
> CMSL12 Type 1 Custom Embedded Subset Type 1, etc.
I get:
A Type 3 Custom A Type 3
B Type 3 Custom B Type 3
> Modern set used most often under LaTeX.) If you don't see the embedded
> Type 1 fonts, then most likely the PDF contains the bitmapped versions
> of the fonts, not the Type 1 fonts.
I'd guess that I'm getting bitmaped fonts. I've never looked into the
different font types though so don't know what the difference is between
Type 1 or Type 3 is?
> I know older versions of Ghostscript would *only* bitmap
> the fonts, and that is why I switched over to pstill.
Makes sense, that was my first feeling about this.
> (One would expect Adobe Distiller to correctly the fonts though.)
Yes, that was the reason I was prompted to ask the question. When I saw
this a couple weeks ago using ps2pdf I figured it was just the program and
that using the acrobat software would fix things. This morning it
suddenly became apparent that the problem runs deeper than that.
- Wayde
(wallen at lug.boulder.co.us)
More information about the LUG
mailing list