[lug] sendmail hell
John Karns
jkarns at csd.net
Mon Jul 30 18:14:47 MDT 2001
On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, David said:
> I have some questions about the behemoth known as sendmail. Any comments
> will *greatly* appreciated!
>
> John,
>
> Probably you know a lot more than I about sendmail. However, I am
I doubt it. Although I bought the O'Reilly sendmail book, it was edition
one, and I don't have it here with me. I hae always relied on the various
distros to do the hard work of setting it up.
> having my own sendmail hell just now (what has worked for years does
> not anymore). In fact this mail is itself an experiment for me 8-)
Ditto here. I recently submitted a Q to this list about the fact that I
was having to manually flush the mail queue of incoming msgs via "sendmail
-q" with my current Linux installation, whereas previously that was not
necessary; the msgs were directed into my personal mailbox at the time of
POP'ing them.
I had always used the command "sendmail -bd -om", and specified the
"expensive" mode. The sendmail SuSE config doc's still mention this
config as preferred for dial-up connections, but the sendmail (ver 8.9.x)
man page that came with a much older SuSE distro (6.4) state that the
"-om" was ignored by sendmail and obsolete. The -om parm combo isn't
even mentioned in the man page for the version installed with the current
versions of SuSE.
> So I am writing to point out something that may help. See
> http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section5.html#5.3.2
> which points out that linuxconf causes the rewrite!! of sendmail.cf at
> every boot. There may be other stuff there that will help you.
SuSE has a similar utility called SuSEconfig which does the same thing,
unless configured otherwise.
----------------------------------------------------------------
John Karns jkarns at csd.net
Subject line of a recent spam msg: "Email Advertising WITHOUT Spam!......"
More information about the LUG
mailing list