[lug] Still more XEmacs.
David
dajo at frii.com
Tue Aug 21 11:15:50 MDT 2001
> Yes, more excitement with XEmacs - lots of folks having problems with it lately,
> aren't there?
yes they are. But it should be noted that in two recent cases one
turned out to be a keyboard mapping problem in a Linux distribution;
and the other was a case of someone not understanding the intricacies
and difficulties with hosting regular expressions.
I use GNU emacs, and never have used xemacs; but with that caveat:
> This particular problem comes in several flavours - first, the most disturbing
> (which may possibly just be my XEmacs being silly). This would be the fact
> that XEmacs completely decides to ignore the site-init.el file, which I placed
> in what I thought would be the default location for it (/usr/X11R6/lib/xemacs-21.1.14/lisp/site-init.el), given that a file called site-load.el lives in the
> same directory. Surprise surprise, XEmacs loads neither of them on start!
> Considering that this is a (supposedly) carefully assembled package for
> Slackware, where should these files go?
I put something in site-lisp a few weeks ago with the same nothing
result. It turned out I had used the wrong directory. I forget the
rest, but you might investigate you machine from that point of view.
Here is what I get.
Rednose root /usr find . -name site-lisp -print
./local/share/emacs/20.7/site-lisp
./local/share/emacs/site-lisp
./share/emacs/site-lisp
It happens that I have been caught by the cons.org site being down,
too. I have been unable to get ilisp and cmucl. Fortunately, I am
able to use another distribution, although still I am lacking ilisp.
> READER-ERROR at 1428 on #<SB-SYS:FD-STREAM
> for "file \"/usr/X11R6/lib/xemacs/xemacs-packages/l\isp/ilisp/cmulisp.lisp\""
> {9196EDD}>:
> package "LISP" not found
have you looked in the file to see what you can glean?
> (2) (error/warning) Error in process filter: (error Variable binding depth exce\eds max-specpdl-size)
this looks to be an emacs message, as a rule this indicates a problem
causing a run-away; but it can mean heavy duty processing.
User Option Information
max-specpdl-size
*Limit on number of Lisp variable bindings & unwind-protects.
If Lisp code tries to make more than this many at once,
an error is signaled.
value: 1000
Try increasing the value of max-specpdl-size with
(setq max-specpdl-size 10000)
More information about the LUG
mailing list