[lug] looking for TeX viewer/print
J. Wayde Allen
wallen at lug.boulder.co.us
Fri Aug 24 17:09:01 MDT 2001
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 rotering at animalcules.com wrote:
> One drawback of this production cycle is that ghostscript font
> rendering leaves something to be desired. This means that the PDF
> file produced looks a bit shabby under Windows, but it prints
> perfectly well.
I was dealing with this a while back. The thread on this can be found in
the archives starting at
http://archive.lug.boulder.co.us/bymonth/2001.05/msg00320.html
I summarized my solution at
http://archive.lug.boulder.co.us/bymonth/2001.05/msg00334.html
- Wayde
(wallen at lug.boulder.co.us)
More information about the LUG
mailing list