[lug] GUI support, can I help you?

[Timothy C. Klein]

It is important to realize the difference here between the two
interfaces.  The GUI is generally easier for the new user:  they are
recognition based.  A user recognizes how the job is to be accomplished
by looking at the interface.  A CLI is generally easier for the
experienced user: they are recollection based.  One must recall how the
tool works to use it.  For the fisrt use, this is impossible.  Thus one
must read man pages, or whatever in the beginning.  The best result
would seem to be had, then, by combining the two.  That way, the new
user is not lost, but the expert user is not hampered by a slow
interface.  Anyone know of any example software that does this?  I don't
think it is very common.

The problem with Windows and Mac is that they have gone completely GUI,
or recognition, in many cases.  The expert is often hampered by this,
the newbie is usually helped by this, though.  Unix is usually the other
way, the expert user feels very at home, and has great power, but the
newbie is completely lost.  The best goal for Linux would be to give the
new user the ease of use for the most common tasks that is present in
the GUI world.  But at the same time, the expert tools
of the CLI should remain completely viable.

Just some random thoughts,

Tim

* Riggs, Rob (RRiggs at doubleclick.net) wrote:
> Some of the CLI interfaces I've seen are ridiculous and should have been
> stillborn. I would not use any of the adjectives below for the majority of
> CLI tools I've seen. The only exception is when the given CLI tool is 'vi'.
> 
> I'm really sick of the CLI worshipping so prevalent in the Unix community.
> CLI is great. I couldn't do my job half as well with out my command line
> tools. Grep, sed, awk, ImageMagick, etc. are indispensable. But GUI tools
> are a far more efficient for the user when systems grow to any appreciable
> complexity. The amount of information that can be conveyed in a GUI is
> orders of magnitude greater than that of a CLI. "A picture is worth a
> thousand words." -- Really, it's true!
> 
> -Rob
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rotering at animalcules.com [mailto:rotering at animalcules.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:51 AM
> To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
> Subject: Re: [lug] GUI support, can I help you?
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:20:13AM -0600, Harris, James wrote:
> 
> > These [command line tools] ARE the tools that the developer provided for
> > those of us who want to be old fashioned.
> 
> Command line tools are not quaint, archaic, scary, or old fashioned.
> They are compact, efficient, fast, flexible, transparent, and
> powerful.
> 
> If there's one thing I'm going to accomplish before I die it'll be to
> convince people that Flashy GUI != (necessarily good | better than CLI
> | necessarily easy).  If it takes large, pointed sticks of appreciable
> diameter then so be it.
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
--
==============================================
== Timothy Klein || teece at silverklein.net   ==
== ---------------------------------------- ==
== "Hello, World" 17 Errors, 31 Warnings... ==
==============================================
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/pipermail/lug/attachments/20011026/066d26d5/attachment.pgp>