[lug] how secure is Netscape 6.x?
qqq1one @yahoo.com
qqq1one at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 9 12:54:22 MST 2002
OK, so not even NS 4 was ever OS'd. Well, do BLUGers recommend mozilla
then? Or perhaps Konqueror instead? I'm looking for a safe (as in
secure), stable browser that works on all web features (excluding
MS-only features, of course).
--- trentjarvi at yahoo.com wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, qqq1one @yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > Just wondering. NS 4.x was open source, correct? Not so of NS
> 6.x,
> > right? I know it's based on mozilla, which is OS, but AOL/Netscape
> has
> > changed code and not released it, no?
> >
> > What I getting at is, if there's an exploitable bug, are we or are
> we
> > not as likely to hear about it along with a patch forthcoming?
> Anybody?
> >
>
> There never was an open source Netscape as far as I know. Yes its a
> spawn from Mosaic as was IE. They handed the code base over to
> mozilla.org which is not AOL. I'm sure some people hacking on
> mozilla
> locally would be glad to agree. Very responsible actions if you ask
> me.
>
> I'm sure there are legal issues that prevent netscape from being open
>
> source (third party packages). They did well just in making it
> possible
> to hand mozilla back to the community.
>
> If you want source review and timely patches support mozilla.org.
>
> --
> Trent Jarvi
> trentjarvi at yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
More information about the LUG
mailing list