CBDTPA is DOA (was RE: [lug] Another SSSCA derivative)

[D. Stimits]

Crawford Rainwater wrote:
> 
> >From the CLUE-Talk list, Charlie Oriez posting:
> 
> Wired just broke a story
> 
> http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,51425,00.html
> 
> It's dead Jim.  At least for this year.  Thank you notes should go to
> Leahy.  And yes, I do think Leahy can make it stick.

I like Leahy already.

D. Stimits, stimits at idcomm.com

> 
> The story also suggests a message that may be effective in opposing
> it down the road.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: lug-admin at lug.boulder.co.us [mailto:lug-admin at lug.boulder.co.us]On
> > Behalf Of D. Stimits
> > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:15 AM
> > To: BLUG
> > Subject: [lug] Another SSSCA derivative
> >
> >
> > Here's one I hadn't seen till now:
> >   http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html
> >
> > D. Stimits, stimits at idcomm.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> > Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug