[lug] Re: More on Reply-To
Peter Hutnick
peter-lists at hutnick.com
Thu Jun 6 16:22:24 MDT 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 06 June 2002 04:16 pm, John Hernandez wrote:
> True, it would be nice to add a preference into the MUAs:
>
> Honor reply-to
> Ignore reply-to
> Ask before using reply-to
Aaah. Let's not plunge into a spiral of mis-features to correct other
mis-features!
You probably wouldn't even think of such a thing if it weren't for the
negative side effects of reply-to munging by mailing list managers.
I think the best thing is to 1. fight the good fight against reply-to munging
and 2. use "reply all" when in doubt and fix the to: line by hand.
Next up, vi vs. Emacs and Coke vs. Pepsi!
- -Peter
- --
/"\ ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail
\ /
X Get my PGP key at http://hutnick.com/pgp
/ \ 6128 5651 6F23 EC17 6EBD 737D 960A 20E6 76CA 8A59
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8/+Cllgog5nbKilkRAhsHAKCOsDSFyB9XQpRLv9a+ry7+77CAGQCfTYwC
0/HTLrHCBVdvaZcH1iK8Ab8=
=j90r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the LUG
mailing list