[lug] Re: More on Reply-To (was: Re: Hacking Society Meeting tonight!)

[Matt Armstrong]

Tkil <tkil at scrye.com> writes:

> Rob> Why don't you just write a elisp macro to deal with it on your
> Rob> MUA? ;)
>
> That's harder than you might think.  There are cases where Reply-To is
> properly set by the author of the message, and it should be honored;
> that's one reason why having the mailing-list software insert it is a
> bad idea.
>
> *shrug*  Maybe I need to implement an "ignore Reply-To values in this
> list" feature.

Gnus has this (and I see you're using Gnus).  See the broken-reply-to
group parameter.


-- 
Don't send mail to David.Rice at hole.lickey.com
The address is there for spammers to harvest.