[lug] Fetchmail, smtp, procmail, and port 110
j davis
davis_compz at hotmail.com
Wed Jul 10 22:05:51 MDT 2002
Do you have the popmail problem while eth0 is still down?
jd
>From: "D. Stimits" <stimits at idcomm.com>
>Reply-To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
>To: lug at lug.boulder.co.us
>Subject: Re: [lug] Fetchmail, smtp, procmail, and port 110
>Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:48:19 -0600
>
>"J. Wayde Allen" wrote:
> >
> > On a different note, I've recently been setting up a home network, and
> > have managed to cause problems with my wife's fetchmail
> > installation. This is also a KRUD system and seemed to be able to pop
> > mail from her dialup account without any problems. Since installing the
> > ethernet card I've developed a number of questions:
> >
> > - How does one configure the ppp dialup to coexist with the ethernet
> > link? Actually, they both work, but in order to get a ppp
>connection
> > I have to shutdown the eth0 network. I'm fairly certain that this
>is
> > due to the need for the dialup server to set the local IP address
> > whereas my eth0 interface assumes that the network uses a fixed
> > IP. Ultimately the plan is to migrate off of the dialup service,
>so
> > having to drop the eth0 interface to talk isn't a big problem, but
>I
> > was curious is there is a way to fix this?
>
>I am guessing that the machine with ppp has the ethernet card set as a
>default route, and that ppp is not overriding it. Unless the ethernet IS
>the default route, remove that, and let the netmask select it when
>needed; the ppp scripts should add a route to the ppp0 if another route
>default is not overriding it (I haven't done this enough to know it will
>always behave this way, but I have semi-recently run into the same
>problem, and corrected it by telling to not consider the eth0 as default
>route).
>
> >
> > - The more serious issue is that my wife's fetchmail service has
>gotten
> > to be very slow. It works, but after connecting to the server and
> > determining that there is mail available it sits for about 1 minute
> > before issuing a "Can't raise smtp listener, switching to procmail"
> > or something similar. After that things work OK. Her .fetchmailrc
> > file also has a "port 110" line. Not sure why that would be since
>I
> > think smtp traffic should normally be on port 25.
>
><grain of salt, not positive, could be foolish>
>Port 25 local is for incoming email being pushed to you. Port 110 is
>pop3 being pulled from a site. If the other side has pop3, you would
>"pull" via that port, or the other end could be set to voluntarily
>"push" mail to your 25...it depends on who is requesting the transfer,
>and whether it is sending its own data, or requesting data from the
>other side. Perhaps authentication settings are causing the delay.
></grain of salt>
>
>D. Stimits, stimits at idcomm.com
>
> >
> > - Wayde
> > (wallen at lug.boulder.co.us)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> > Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> > Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug
>_______________________________________________
>Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
>Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
>Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug
thanks,
jd
jd at taproot.bz
http://www.taproot.bz
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
More information about the LUG
mailing list