[lug] SUPERIOR ISP

[Frank Whiteley]

If all else fails, how about multilink?  What is his current dialup?  If
40K+, then adding more lines and modems will just multiply this at
incremental costs of the lines and access with neglible binding loss.  We
call it poor man's ISDN.

I'm currently running one client on 4*ISDN and latency is 23-25ms.  I
recently installed multilink*2 for a client in Grover (try Mapquest).  She
gets 46.6-48K per channel and is very happy (pro proprietary software
developer/support geek).

Note that 24/7 dedicated connections are more expensive, but it's hard to
beat for price/performance for dial-up access.

Frank Whiteley
Greeley

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Schroeder" <jeff at neobox.net>
To: <lug at lug.boulder.co.us>
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: [lug] SUPERIOR ISP


> > I have a friend who lives in superior (just outside
> > Boulder) who is finally tired of his dial-up
> > connection.  He's looking for a high speed connection
> > and has only been able to find one option... dish.
>
> I lived in Superior for three years (recently moved to Longmont), and I
> was able to get DSL at 144k and, later, Sprint broadband.  Of course
> Sprint has oversubscribed the Denver market, so he's out of luck there.
> But he might check DSL connectivity by looking somewhere like
> http://www.dslreports.com...
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us portf67 channel
>