[lug] testing for straight versus cross-over patch cables?
D. Stimits
stimits at attbi.com
Tue Aug 20 13:35:15 MDT 2002
J. Wayde Allen wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Mr Viggy wrote:
>
>
>>Heh. What annoys me is the IT guy that told me I could easily tap into
>>the thinnet (RG-58) in the cieling to connect up an HP plotter. Funny
>>thing, after connecting it up, half the machines in the marketing dept
>>go offline. Seems that the 3 extra feet of cable I added was just too much!
>
>
> How exactly did you go about doing this? The reason I'm asking is that
> the coax based (RG-58) thin net can't simply be tapped. It has to loop
> through your computer and then back to the other machines downstream from
> you. Basically, you took the downstream computers off-line when you cut
> the cable. If you tried simply putting a "T" in the line and running a
> three foot extension to your network card, you effectively created a
> coaxial tuning stub on the line that modified the impedance of the line.
> This can cause standing waves that will have rather unpredictable results
> (some machines keep working while those in the RF null fail).
Now you know why they suck at higher speeds. That is exactly the way it
is done.
My guess:
The signal itself is probably *very far* from a sine wave...with square
waves (infinite sum of odd harmonics) and complex waveforms you can't
tune it anyway, high Q tuning destroys your ability to carry non-sine
waves, it has to be very low Q. You add more pure resistance, and accept
resistive losses and noise (in return for lower distortions on non-sine
waves).
D. Stimits, stimits AT attbi.com
>
> The tap would need to be something like:
>
>
> Thin net <--------------| |------------------> Thin net
> | |
> | |
> | |
> T
> ---------------
> | Your computer |
> ---------------
>
> - Wayde
> (wallen at lug.boulder.co.us)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug
>
More information about the LUG
mailing list