[lug] top posting WAS Re: NO Attachments!!!
Chris Riddoch
socket at peakpeak.com
Thu Oct 24 17:18:51 MDT 2002
"Sexton, George" <gsexton at mhsoftware.com> writes:
> Personally, I think requiring bottom posting is one of the silliest things I
> have seen. You mean I have to wade through the message to find what the
> person said. Ridiculous.
Bottom- and mixed-posting puts the flow of conversation in what I
would consider a reasonable order.
You say something, then I say something, and so on. I'll bottom-post
if there's really one major idea to respond to. Otherwise, I try to
respond to individual points by splitting what a person says into
multiple groups of quoted lines, with my responses in reasonable
places between groups. That way, it flows as though you say
something, then I give a response, then you say something else, and I
respond...
--
Chris Riddoch | epistemological
socket at peakpeak.com | humility
More information about the LUG
mailing list