[lug] Debian is better?
Daniel Webb
webb at danielwebb.us
Wed Dec 18 20:04:50 MST 2002
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Timothy C. Klein wrote:
> I have found this to be far superior in Debian that RedHat, Slackware,
> Suse, etc. A Debian package, the great majority of the time, is ready
> and up and running as soon as it installs. apt-get install <package> is
> all the configuration you need to do a bunch of the time. The Debian
> developers work hard to give a very sane default install. This is true,
> even, of a lot of the daemons.
Yup, same here. I started out with Redhat 6.1 because I was pulling my
hair out that Windows crashed every 2 hours. About 6 month later I
switched to Debian because I was pulling my hair out that I couldn't
install a single @#$!@ .rpm package without spending another hour finding
all the dependencies it needed. I'm sure none of you RedHat users have
ever had that happen though. I never used --nodeps, yet I was somehow
able to dig myself in several dependency holes.
I was also rooted. The update service cost money then, so I just
checked the errata pages for serious bugs. The bug that was used on me
was not even in the Redhat database any more, but the Redhat person I
email knew about it from "way back". Like 6 months before that.
Debian is not perfect, and I have noticed an increase in bugs in general
in the Woody release (I would guess that it is now only slightly less
buggy than RedHat). It's not a starter distro, but all in all, I think it
is easier to admin, install, and upgrade packages than RedHat.
I noticed that RedHat was an easier install on my laptop last time I
tried, but Woody installs so easy on the desktop I'm not sure what the
difference is. X worked for me without any adjustments. Right now Debian
is behind in the "easy to install" area, but look at Knoppix, which is a
Debian distro. It boots off a CD into X with networking configured on
every computer I have tried it on (three now).
I'm glad RedHat is out there, though, and I hope they keep making money
(they're in the black now, right?) They have really supported a lot of
good stuff, like autotools development (thanks, Tom!)
More information about the LUG
mailing list