[lug] wlan
Rob Nagler
nagler at bivio.biz
Wed Feb 19 20:12:25 MST 2003
Stephen Queen writes:
> From surface appearance it looks to me like 802.11a would be a better
> course to take than 802.11b because of the higher bit rate. Am I
> correct, or are there problems I am unaware of with the 802.11a?
I just tried my first 802.11a install, and it was less than
successful. I'm going back to try 802.11b, but the 802.11a didn't
even go across one floor of a house. I had to move the router to a
more central location, but the signal strengths were all low
(6-12mbps). At 6mbps, the card wouldn't actually connect. It would
see the router, but that's it. This is without WEP.
I don't understand the physics, but I'm guessing 5ghz (a) doesn't
penetrate as well as 2.4ghz (b).
> Does anyone know of an equivalent product that has drivers for Linux,
> or a source of drivers for these products, or a good suggestion for a
> better route to take?
I also don't know of drivers for Linux. I installed three PCI cards
(Netgear ha311) on Windows XP. One of the cards caused XP to freeze
every now and then. I called Netgear, and they didn't have a solution
for me (except uninstall and reinstall). They were friendly,
though. :)
Rob
More information about the LUG
mailing list