[lug] port 901 scans

[The Matt]

On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 19:48, D. Stimits wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of port 901 scans (samba web admin tool), but I 
> haven't heard of any recent samba vulnerabilities. I'm curious if anyone 
> here has noticed an increase in scans to this port, or has otherwise 
> heard of why this might be increasing?

No, you aren't the only one.  Yesterday on Incidents someone mentioned
the same thing:

http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/75/323580/2003-05-31/2003-06-06/0


-- 
"And isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony, anyway?  I mean,
all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good
and crazy, ooh ooh ooh, the sky's the limit!" -- The Tick
  The Matt -- http://ucsub.colorado.edu/~thompsma/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/pipermail/lug/attachments/20030603/a50b4cc5/attachment.pgp>