[lug] colo at home info
Nate Duehr
nate at natetech.com
Sun Aug 17 15:36:43 MDT 2003
Frank Whiteley wrote:>
> However, that's not the way they engineered their DSL system and as you may
> know, they don't offer it over Qwest facility provided to McLeod or other
> CLECs. It's their game and their rules, PUC can't touch it under current
> policy. Your alternative may be through an ISP offering New Edge Networks,
> with no dial tone and none offered, and you may be able to add VOIP before
> long. It is more expensive, but it's also lower latency and SDSL. A 768K
> SDSL really rocks, both ways.
>
> Frank Whiteley
This so-called "engineering" is smoke and mirrors in this context,
really. It's just their provisioning database. Nothing about the
DSLAM's or any of the other equipment they're using requires dial-tone
be on the line.
SDSL is good stuff, but expensive -- had Rhythms SDSL out near C-470 &
Ken-Caryl Road years ago before they went under and I moved.
And... if PUC can't say that a non-regulated service can't require a
regulated one be installed, then you're right... voting with my wallet
will be the only way to go eventually.
--
Nate Duehr, nate at natetech.com
More information about the LUG
mailing list