[lug] Cluster Mfr Recommends
Chuck Morrison
cmorrison at greeleynet.com
Mon Mar 14 21:04:03 MST 2005
I have worked with aspen systems on rather large (several hundred servers) deployments. The last one was about a year and a half ago. Overall I'd have to say it was a positive experience. The quality was much better than I expected and service was good on the few replacements that were required.
Chuck Morrison
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:41:15 -0700
"Patty Laushman" <patty at theuptimegroup.com> wrote:
> We would recommend Aspen Systems (www.aspsys.com) too. We haven't dealt
> with them directly either, but we like to work with local companies when we
> can. Also, they've been around a LONG time, so they must be doing something
> right!
>
> Patty Laushman
> President
> The Uptime Group, Inc.
> (303) 757-4611, Ext. 404
> www.theuptimegroup.com
>
>
> On 2005-03-14 15:37 -0700, Steve Sullivan <Steve Sullivan wrote:
> > The company I work with wants to purchase several linux clusters and
> > is looking for recommendations.
> > The typical cluster is 6 to 12 computers in one rack.
> > Usually reliability is a big issue, with high availability software,
> > fail-overs, etc.
> >
> > They want Intel Pentiums and run their own version of Debian.
> > They need a company that can deliver to Washington, Boulder and other
> > cities.
> >
> > Who would you recommend?
> >
>
> Haven't dealt with them but they are marginally local:
> http://www.aspsys.com
>
> --
> -Nick Golder
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug
More information about the LUG
mailing list