[lug] LVM and disk failure
Sean Reifschneider
jafo at tummy.com
Sun Jan 15 23:26:53 MST 2006
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 09:17:03PM -0700, Daniel Webb wrote:
>makes it that much more likely that you'll lose the whole thing. Sure, you
>can put it on top of RAID, but now you lost your size flexibility because RAID
>isn't so easy to resize (or is it?). The snapshots feature is nice, that's
RAID-0 and 1 are extremely easy to extend. See the "mdadm" option
"--grow". Currently it only really supports RAID-1 and I imagine RAID-0
and RAID-10.
Some hardware RAID controllers can handle changing the size and even
RAID-level of arrays including RAID-5. So, you could change from a RAID-10
array to RAID-5, or RAID-5 to RAID-10, as long as you don't mind losing
some of your capacity...
Thanks,
Sean
--
That weapon will replace your tongue. You will learn to speak through
it. And your poetry will now be written with blood. -- _Dead_Man_
Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff <jafo at tummy.com>
tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability
More information about the LUG
mailing list