[lug] DD-WRT
Ken MacFerrin
lists at macferrin.com
Wed Feb 22 17:07:30 MST 2006
Nate Duehr wrote:
> Daniel Webb wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:36:15AM -0700, Ken MacFerrin wrote:
>>
>>> This is what I'm really interested in. I have 2 ATA's with 3 Vonage
>>> lines running behind one of my WRT54G's on a Comcast HSI connection.
>>> I've tried many different combos of QoS settings but have yet to find
>>> one that works well under any real load. Most any time there is
>>> heavy traffic (especially upstream) the voice quality takes a
>>> nosedive. I'd love to find a firmware that could get VoIP QoS
>>> right. Most the firmwares will allow you prioritize SIP but it's not
>>> much help as SIP is only used to setup the VoIP connection. The
>>> actual voice protocol is usually RTP or some other protocol that
>>> that's similarly hard to track..
>>
>>
>> Can't you just classify by source/destination IP address if you're using
>> external ATAs? If you feel masochistic, do the tc/iptables stuff
>> yourself.
>> I've got a start on my web site, but it needs
>> improvement/customization to be
>> really useful. It works ok for me though.
>
>
> Follow-up on this. I now have a Linksys PAP2 hooked up to one of the
> internal ports on the WRT54GS running the DD-WRT software, and I've used
> the internal QoS settings to set that port to the highest priority and
> lower everything else a notch. Since I also use it from time to time, I
> used the built-in settings for Skype/SkypeOut in the DD-WRT software to
> prioritize that as well.
>
> I also lowered the voice quality of the Vonage that's feeding the PAP2
> to 30Kb/s just 'cause... who needs to waste 90Kb/s for a phone call? :-)
>
> So far, virtually zero complaints. When originally installed the Vonage
> was NOT on a port of the WRT54GS, was not QoS'ed and was set at 90K. I
> got reports that I was breaking up on every call.
>
> Another important thing I found... MTU sizes were ALL too big for the
> DSL line. PPPoA sucks away some bits, of course, and I'd never
> accounted or changed anything for it. Also the WRT54GS with QoS on
> sucks away even a few more... so MTU's had to be adjusted behind it to
> account for the correct sizes for what would actually pass without
> fragmenting. I do NOT see a setting in the PAP2 for this,
> unfortunately, or it would probably help... but at least now the only
> device that's probably still set to 1500 MTU is the PAP2, giving the
> poor little Linksys less to do unfragmenting things... if it's not just
> passing them along...
>
I've tried setting the QoS using MAC and IP settings and either will
work fine for 1 call on 1 ATA with low traffic but having 3 lines on 2
ATAs plus any real traffic (VPNs, SSH, SMTP/IMAP) and things start to
get ugly. I've also set the Vonage bandwidth down to 30Kb/s but I have
not tried adjusting the MTUs. Given that it's a cables modem line I'm
not sure if this will be significant but it's worth a try..
-Ken
More information about the LUG
mailing list