[lug] server spec
Bear Giles
bgiles at coyotesong.com
Sat Jun 9 12:11:03 MDT 2007
karl horlen wrote:
>> I would also look into whether mysql has
>> solved its load
>> problems. I know a while back postgresql had a
>> slower connect time(*)
>> but handled heavier loads gracefully. Mysql had a
>> faster connect time
>> but would fail catastrophically once the load
>> crossed a magic threshold.
>>
>
> don't know?
>
I'm not sure what your question is.
I don't track mysql closely since it's a total nonstarter for me without
referential integrity, but I'm sure it's improved in the years since
that comparison. Ultimately you can only know for sure after you set up
a test box and hit it with a heavy, but representative, load. 500k
requests/day is only about 6 per second on average, although you would
want to test higher peak loads.
More information about the LUG
mailing list