[lug] FW: Student Buff Bulletin 08/30/2007

[Sean Reifschneider]

On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 06:06:08PM -0600, Collins Richey wrote:
>putting down whom? Ancient is rather factual. We use RHEL4 at work -
>adequate for development tasks, but you would never confuse it with an
>up-to-date distro, and before Debian Etch was released Debian Stable

Maybe I'm misunderstanding something here, but it seems to me that you're
saying "an old version of RHEL feels old".  The current version of RHEL is
5, released in April of 2007.  It's based on FC6, which was released around
10 months ago.

I'm not sure it's at all fair, even in the fast-moving computer industry,
to call either of these "ancient".

Sean
-- 
 "I feel lazy, but..."  "... but it's a hyper kind of lazy?"  "Yeah!"
                -- Ines and Sean, 2002
Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff <jafo at tummy.com>
tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability