[lug] video card recommandation for 1680x1050?

[bgiles at coyotesong.com]

I am planning to use this:

http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?Prodid=11227803&search=optiquest&Mo=0&cm_re=1_en-_-Top_Left_Nav-_-Top_search&lang=en-US&Nr=P_CatalogName:BC&Sp=S&N=0&whse=BC&Dx=mode+matchallpartial&Ntk=Text_Search&Dr=P_CatalogName:BC&Ne=4000000&D=optiquest&Ntt=optiquest&No=0&Ntx=mode+matchallpartial&Nty=1&topnav=&s=1


> For that matter, what monitor would you recommend at resolutions
> like that?
>
> Steve
>
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 09:58:25AM -0600, dio2002 at indra.com wrote:
>> > Does anyone have video card recommendations for 1680x1050 resolution?
>> I'm
>> > looking for something very generic, but with better resolution than
>> the
>> > minimal controllers built into motherboards.  (I think mine is
>> currently
>> > only supported to 1024x768 under Linux, and 1200x1024(?) under
>> Windows.)
>>
>> I'd also be interested if anybody has recently purchased and installed
>> vcard that supports 1920 x 1200 and didn't have to do a lot of
>> proprietary
>> driver / config wrangling to make it work.  Anything working out of the
>> box these days with RH?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
>> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
>> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug
>
> --
>
> ========================================
> Steve Sullivan    sullivan at mathcom.com
>
> http://www.mathcom.com    303-494-7115
> ========================================
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#colug
>