[lug] CLIQ redux

[Sean Reifschneider]

Michael J. Hammel wrote:
> So how do people feel about this idea:  is it time for another open

Well, there doesn't seem to have been much response about it.

Maybe it's a better idea to try the waters with another of those things
that we had before the CLIQ that kind of lead to it.  I can't remember what
we called it, but it was the thing we had at NIST with the few dozen booths
and then people literally cramming into the available space...  1999-ish or
so?  I guess we called it the "Mini Expo".

> Then again, as bad as the economy is, where would we find the sponsors?

Sponsors?  Evelyn says that advertising often goes up when the economy goes
down, which I can see the point for.

Sean
-- 
Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff <jafo at tummy.com>
tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/pipermail/lug/attachments/20090106/d404315f/attachment.pgp>