[lug] The issues of separate /home partitions, or maybe just freedesktop/SuSE problems?
Bear Giles
bgiles at coyotesong.com
Thu Mar 19 20:24:24 MDT 2009
On 3/19/2009 3:28 PM, Chris Riddoch wrote:
> I once heard the advice of using separate partitions for /home in
> order to ease upgrades - the / partition can be wiped and reinstalled
> from scratch, and the personal data on /home is unaffected by a fresh
> install. It seemed like a great idea. I'm wondering, though, if this
> might be responsible for some really broken behavior.
>
Elaborating on this slightly, there's actually several good reasons for
this:
1) you can keep /home through wipes. The same logic applies to /var/log
(find out why the system crashed) and various services. E.g., I have
separate partitions for /var/lib/postgresql and /var/lib/svn (subversion
source control).
2) you CAN'T take down the system by some rogue process that fills a
user directory. (This applies to the other partitions as well.)
3) you can mount /home as nodev, nosuid and even noexec, closing the
door to various abuses. This is less important on personal systems, but
still a good idea to block some types of malware. (You should do the
same on /tmp, for the same reason.)
4) you can encrypt /home without encrypting the entire filesystem. Now
it's more common to encrypt the entire disk but that was much harder to
do a few years ago.
I thought there were a few other reasons for a separate /home partition,
but they've slipped my mind at the moment.
More information about the LUG
mailing list