[lug] discussion/change of topic: new startup tools
Zan Lynx
zlynx at acm.org
Tue Jun 9 10:58:34 MDT 2009
Nate Duehr wrote:
>> The author(s) of upstart are doing a re-write right now. It turns out
>> that the way they were doing their model didn't work at all for some
>> use cases, so they went back and did a redesign and are doing a
>> re-write. Once thats done, I expect both Fedora and Ubuntu will start
>> moving scripts to native upstart.
>
> So... big picture-wise here...
>
> Sun seems to have started this trend with creating a new way to start up
> Unix systems in Solaris 10, and then the Linuxes copy-catted it but made
> it completely different (as usual)...
>
> What I've been trying to figure out for a while was... what REAL
> benefits does any of this have over having just about everything on
> SysV?
I never liked SysV myself. I think we should have all stayed with
straight init and inittab. These unnecessarily complicated and slow
SysV scripts never seemed to have much of an advantage.
It isn't just Solaris. I believe OS X actually started the trend with
launchd.
--
Zan Lynx
zlynx at acm.org
"Knowledge is Power. Power Corrupts. Study Hard. Be Evil."
More information about the LUG
mailing list