[lug] Ethernet Enabled PLC/Linux Microcontroller

[Swavek Skret]

Steve,

I am looking at possibly many of these and for various hardware devices. I
am also looking at some alternatives for NMS protocols that might sit on
each of these devices to provide feedback, view, redundancy, etc. I will
check if TS-7400 has SNMP on it (probably not, I guess).

And you are right, an additional investment at front might help to carry
long way later (updates, maintenance, etc.)
Thanks,
Swavek
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Stephen Queen <svqueen at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>   On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Swavek Skret <swavek.skret at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>   I need to control a hardware unit that does not have a standard
>> interface (ethernet, RS-232, etc) but simply provides a binary voltage to
>> flag that it functions correctly or not. I am considering using an ethernet
>> enabled microcontroller with Linux OS ideally.
>>
>> If anyone has related experience and would like to share or recommend a
>> particular hardware I would appreciate it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Swavek
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
>> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
>> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#hackingsociety
>>
>
>
>
> Are you looking at a one off, or are you looking to produce many? If it is
> a one off, it is a little more expensive in immediate costs, but will save
> you a lot of time, try looking at the TS-7400 from Technologic.
> www.embeddedarm.com
>
> Steve Queen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: lug.boulder.co.us port=6667 channel=#hackingsociety
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/pipermail/lug/attachments/20090731/d6d7518a/attachment.html>