[lug] traceroute on forwarded ports plus socks vs port forward
Dan Ferris
dan at usrsbin.com
Wed Jul 6 13:42:44 MDT 2011
OpenVPN is your friend in these types of situations. You can use an
OpenVPN server to push routes for things around. It's also a lot more
reliable that using things like SSH tunnels.
Dan
On 7/6/2011 10:48 AM, karl horlen wrote:
> i'm trying to route local port 80 / 443 locally to an external server
> so i can browse through it.
>
> is there a way to confirm that i am indeed using those ports? when i
> run a tracert (the client is windows and i'm running tracert from cmd
> aka dos prompt), the hops still route through my dsl provider. i
> presume that is the correct behavior since traceroute probably works
> on a different port other than 80 or 443.
>
> so other than using a packet sniffer, is there a command i can run to
> prove when i load an url in a browser that i'm actually routing
> through my remote server via ssh tunnel and not through the hops
> associated with my dsl provider.
>
> finally, i'm forwarding two local ports, 80 and 443 and am assuming
> that on a windows box the browser should just find and use these
> ports. i've seen recommendations for using a socks proxy to achieve
> the same result. i'm trying to understand the difference. from what
> i gather, a socks proxy will do the same thing but you only have to
> set one forwarding which is the socks ip address instead of two (80
> and 443) in port forwarding method. but you also have to configure
> the app, in this case the browser to use the proxy, an additional
> step. then the browser / app simply forwards all requests on any and
> all ports fed to it to the socks proxy port. is this correct?
>
> i guess i'm not sure what the benefits are to using one method vs the
> other. since ssh (windows putty) allows you to configure multiple
> port forwards in one definition, once you set it up, you just have to
> kick off the connection so it saves you the hassle of enabling
> disabling socks proxy in your browser config.
>
> so why would i want to use a socks proxy? i can't think of any
>
> thanks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: irc.hackingsociety.org port=6667 channel=#hackingsociety
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/pipermail/lug/attachments/20110706/b587fc92/attachment.html>
More information about the LUG
mailing list