[lug] AI survey.

geobodley at aol.com geobodley at aol.com
Fri Nov 17 18:03:20 MST 2017


Has Crystalknows evaluated the Obamas?

 

 



 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh>
To: lug <lug at lug.boulder.co.us>
Sent: Fri, Nov 17, 2017 5:41 pm
Subject: Re: [lug] AI survey.



I commented on a bias about what AI is about...  The feeling it gave is that it is to replace what humans do. I think that's too narrow a definition.



One of my favorite AI apps (besides my Alexa/echo) is CrystalKnows. It does things humans rarely do, and even more rarely do well.  It does personality analysis from people's LinkedIn pages -- and it's pretty scarily accurate in most cases. [It reminds me of the SciFi book The Avogadro  Corp - which is a pretty good AI fiction].  Also, it shows a generational bias by only talking about AI movies - whereas some older people are more likely to have read books (maybe even on dead trees!) than have watched a bunch of movies.  On the other hand, I was surprised how many of those movies I'd seen.



There are lots of similar things that AI can do that people don't do well.  My bias is that this is where AI can really shine.



There's another AI that can tell you a person's sexual orientation something like 80% of the time for males, and a bit less accurately for women. Humans score a bit better than 50% right.



There are lots of things they'll be able to do that we're not good at - and I expect that quite a few things that we're good at that will be slow coming from AIs.



--

  Alan Robertson

  alanr at unix.sh








On Fri, Nov 17, 2017, at 04:10 PM, Chris Riddoch wrote:


Thanks for posting this, Dave.  I like the questions chosen there, and am interested in seeing the results of the project when it's ready!



As an aside (because the survey is already underway) I'd recommend future surveys omit a 'middle' option from some of the range-based questions by using an even number of ranged options.  Middle options can be too tempting an answer for lots of reasons, like being conflated with uncertainty.  I don't know how I'd go about trying to figure this out (much less make the answers comparable), but I'd be very interested in knowing why someone's chosen particular answers for some of these questions.



Cognitive science is a really fun field.





On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:07 AM, David L. Anselmi <anselmi at anselmi.us> wrote:


Hi BLUG,

 

 My daughter is conducting a survey on artificial intelligence to collect data for her undergrad data sciences class project. Would you be so kind as to participate?

 

 It takes 5 min or less and you'll help shift the demographics away from the people she knows on social media. :-)

 

 https://goo.gl/forms/8H9sUHrjoUZDbtCT2

 

 Thanks!

 Dave

 _______________________________________________

 Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us

 Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug

 Join us on IRC: irc.hackingsociety.org port=6667 channel=#hackingsociety








-- 


Chris Riddoch

http://www.syntacticsugar.org/


_______________________________________________

Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.us

Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug

Join us on IRC: irc.hackingsociety.org port=6667 channel=#hackingsociety





_______________________________________________Web Page:  http://lug.boulder.co.usMailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lugJoin us on IRC: irc.hackingsociety.org port=6667 channel=#hackingsociety
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/pipermail/lug/attachments/20171117/965d9dd3/attachment.html>


More information about the LUG mailing list