[lug] Jitsi, etc.
Mike Witt
msg2mw at gmail.com
Sun May 17 17:02:31 MDT 2020
On 05/17/2020 04:43:31 PM, Davide Del Vento wrote:
> Ah! Interesting and unexpected. To me is sounds like Zoom recognizes
> what
> you are framing, and switches compression scheme. Like taking a
> screenshot
> of this email: if you want high quality, PNG beats JPG hands down: to
> get
> high quality on JPG you need a much higher byte count than PNG for
> this
> kind of content.
>
> Just as curiosity, since you have a gmail email, have you tried the
> various
> Google products too? Hangout, Meet and Duo? Not sure why they have so
> many
> things doing the same thing....
No, I haven't. I used to use google hangouts, and then it went away.
Now that you mention it, I do see something when I log on to gmail
offering me to use "meet." Actually I seldom go to gmail. It's a
*terrible* interface. I use POP to get the mail and read it with Balsa.
I have not checked out any of the new google meeting things, nor have I
tried webx yet (although I mean to do that).
> Have you tried Skype?
I haven't used it for a long time.
If I hear anything to indicate that any one of the above really works
well, I'll give it a try. But "give it a try" (to really determine if
it's going to work for the group) is a procedure involving multiple
(busy) people for a non-trivial amount of time.
> On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 12:00 PM Mike Witt <msg2mw at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 05/17/2020 11:50:51 AM, Davide Del Vento wrote:
> > > Are you saying that with your A/B testing Zoom shows the display
> in
> > > better
> > > quality?
> >
> > Yes, that's right. Actually, I can't tell the difference in quality
> > *except* when I point the camera at the white board. It's totally
> > readable with Zoom but unreadable with Jitsi. I don't know whether
> it's
> > actually a problem in the number of pixels or if it's come kind of
> > contrast issue or something. But several people on the other end
> appear
> > to see the same thing.
> >
> > > In my limited tests (the other parties get bored and tired much
> > > sooner than
> > > necessary), the quality varies from an instant to the next, as it
> is
> > > normal
> > > with a packet switched network. So in my tests (with default
> settings
> > > too)
> > > the results are inconclusive.
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 10:55 AM Mike Witt <msg2mw at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This thread is a bit old, but I just wondered if anyone has an
> > > insight
> > > > into the video quality if Jitsi vs Zoom.
> > > >
> > > > I'm doing an online physics study group, and I'm using the white
> > > board
> > > > (real, not virtual). This works OK with Zoom. But the video
> quality
> > > > (that I've experienced) with Jitsi is not good enough for
> people to
> > > > read the writing on the board.
> > > >
> > > > Some specifics:
> > > >
> > > > (1) We've A/Bed it a couple of times switching back and forth.
> Same
> > > > devices, same time, etc.
> > > >
> > > > (2) I have not done anything special to configure Jitsi (or
> Zoom).
> > > >
> > > > (3) I have not tried to run my own Jitsi server. I'm just using
> the
> > > > free one.
> > > >
> > > > Any thoughts on this. Is there some configuration I can do with
> > > Jisti
> > > > that might help? I'd really rather use Jitsi if I can.
> > > >
> > > > -Mike
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> > > > Mailing List:
> http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> > > > Join us on IRC: irc.hackingsociety.org port=6667
> > > channel=#hackingsociety
> > >
> >
> > ------quoted attachment------
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> > > Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> > > Join us on IRC: irc.hackingsociety.org port=6667
> > > channel=#hackingsociety
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> > Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> > Join us on IRC: irc.hackingsociety.org port=6667
> channel=#hackingsociety
>
------quoted attachment------
> _______________________________________________
> Web Page: http://lug.boulder.co.us
> Mailing List: http://lists.lug.boulder.co.us/mailman/listinfo/lug
> Join us on IRC: irc.hackingsociety.org port=6667
> channel=#hackingsociety
More information about the LUG
mailing list